RSS

Using High Level Synthesis and Chip Synthesis together
DAC in hindsight
Xilinx licenses Oasys Chip Synthesis technology
Gabe on EDA recommends seeing Oasys
Juniper Networks picks Oasys RealTime Designer
Gary Smith
DAC
Sanjiv on "Ode to the Chip Synthesis Hero"
Oasys is on Twitter
The Documentation Challenge
Oasys a "must see" at DAC
Gabe Moretti takes another look
Sanjiv's opinion piece over at EEtimes
Mystery fan on ESNUG
Innovation of the year: go and vote
EDA DesignLine
Gabe Moretti over at EDAcafe
Welcome 2010
SCDsource article on Chip Synthesis
Cooley's DAC report is finally out

Saving...

Using High Level Synthesis and Chip Synthesis together 
Jul 8th, 2010 

One of the challenges with design flows involving high-level synthesis from C, C++ or SystemC is that eventually the exact performance of the design needs to be determined. The built-in metrics in HLS tools are fairly good at determining which of two implementation choices has the highest performance or consumes the least power and can thus guide the exploration of the design space.

However, sooner or later the actual performance or power numbers are required. If a design is to process 30 frames of high-definition video per second then 29 just doesn’t do it. And probably 50 frames per second would be wasting a lot of power and silicon area.

Traditional synthesis followed by placement is a cumbersome way of getting at this data. Chip Synthesis using Oasys RealTime Designer is much smoother, getting to a fully-placed design with accurate performance numbers in a short time. HLS can produce a lot of RTL, tens of thousands of lines, very quickly. Luckily RealTime Designer can easily process this fast to get the data that the system level designer needs to finalize a choice of implementation.

Paul van Besouw from Oasys and Devadas Varma of AutoESL have jointly written an article for Embedded Computing Design on just this topic.

DAC in hindsight 
Jun 18th, 2010 

Once again DAC has come and gone. Oasys’s DAC presence was in two parts: inside the suites and the video wall.

Inside the suites the show was almost fully booked. Gary Smith had recommended Oasys on his DAC must-see list (and, organized in order of booth number, fortuitously came at the top of the list). In his Monday morning DAC presentation he talked about Oasys as appearing to be a “real game changer,” which obviously further helped drive up interest and bring decision makers to see the demos. There were two demos, the “normal” one about Chip Synthesis and RealTime Designer’s basic capabilities of synthesizing to placed gates in extraordinarily fast run-times. And a second demo focused on power optimization where an entire design is resynthesized after the voltage of one of its power domains is reduced (so that the unchanged netlist misses timing).

On the video wall were half-a-dozen videos in the style of the “I’m a Mac, I’m a PC” ads comparing Oasys to Synopsys (no prizes for guessing which the cool young Mac-like guy was). With consolidation of DAC, Oasys’s booth had ended up being in one of the far corners, not as good a location as it had looked on the map when the location was picked. But the videos were their own draw. Synopsys execs, even Aart, would walk by pretending not to look, or hold a conversation with Sanjiv while mainly looking over his shoulder. The videos manage to get the point of Oasys’s superior technology across while being humorous and in good taste. Click here or on the home page to watch the videos.

Also available as a giveaway for special customers, EDAgraffiti the book. Except that everyone forgot about them and they remained boxed up for the whole of DAC. Oh well, remaindered already.

Xilinx licenses Oasys Chip Synthesis technology 
Jun 8th, 2010 
Oasys today announced that Xilinx has licensed their Chip Synthesis technology. This follows on the announcement earlier this week with Juniper Networks. Oasys now has one of the companies doing the most leading edge designs on bare silicon, and now the company that creates the substrate for many of the most leading-edge FPGA designs.

It is not entirely clear what Xilinx plans to do with Oasys, and I am not privy to any details. But reading between the lines of the press release, I would guess that Xilinx is going to use RealTime Designer or a derivative of it as part of their flow for their next generation of arrays which will presumably have the capability to handle enormous designs. Presumably this will eventually result in RealTime Designer getting into Xilinx's customers hands, although whether this will be with an Oasys or a Xilinx badge on the hood remains to be seen.

In the short term this announcement is probably most important as a strong validation of the use of RealTime Designer for FPGA based designs.
Gabe on EDA recommends seeing Oasys 
Jun 7th, 2010 
Gabe Moretti has his DAC preview, with his list of companies that attendees should take a look at. We didn't make the headline list (which is largely Synopsys, Magma, Mentor...) which in some sense will be on any visitors list. After all, no matter what new technology is around, something like 90% of EDA usage is probably the big full-line companies. But Gabe ends up suggesting that "other companies that you should visit include Oasys, making loud noises in physical design." Hmm, not quite sure that the positioning is quite right there. I thought we were making loud noises in Chip Synthesis. We'll there's nearly a week to write a router.
Juniper Networks picks Oasys RealTime Designer 
Jun 2nd, 2010 

Oasys today announced that it has closed a deal with Juniper Networks. This is significant for a number of reasons.

Firstly, Juniper designs incredibly complex chips with aggressive performance, since as much as anything their ability to do so is what differentiates them from their competition. Because RealTime Designer can handle Juniper’s designs means it can handle pretty much the most challenging designs in the industry.

Secondly, Juniper has historically been a Synopsys house using Synopsys for both synthesis and place and route. Winning a benchmark in that kind of environment is significant. As Debashis Basu, the VP of Silicon Development at Juniper says, “It’s a great tool that fits a very real performance need.”

Thirdly, Juniper have gone public on their adoption of RealTime Designer and so are a reference account, rather than keeping their heads down to avoid any potential bad feeling with their primary tool supplier, Synopsys.

Here's is Aart in a Synopsys press release on why accounts like Juniper are so important: "Technology leaders like Juniper Networks achieve success through innovation in both silicon and system design, and therefore strategically align with partners who share the same passion and commitment to developing breakthrough technology," said Aart de Geus, chairman and CEO of Synopsys.

I couldn't put it better myself. Winning in a high-profile account like Juniper Networks is a great achievement for the Oasys team.




Gary Smith 
Jun 1st, 2010 
Every year Gary Smith EDA produces a list of around 20 companies to see at DAC. Oasys is on this years list, yeah! In fact, since the list is put together in booth number order, and Oasys has the lowest booth number of any company on the list, it is the first name on the list. Even better. The list is here.
DAC 
Jun 1st, 2010 

DAC is coming up in just a few weeks, of course. Oasys will be there at booth 202. Following on from last year’s rock video, Oasys will have something new this year…but you’ll have to come by and see it for yourself, my lips are sealed.

If you are interested in a suite demo, then you can signup. Go to the home page and click on either the DAC logo or the big red “register” logo. That will take you to a page where you can request a slot. Further, one person each day who attends a suite demo will win an Apple iPad.

SCDsource has already called Oasys a "must-see" at this year's DAC. So sign up and make sure you don't miss it.

Sanjiv on "Ode to the Chip Synthesis Hero" 
May 21st, 2010 
Sanjiv has a piece in Electronic Design called "Ode to the Chip Synthesis Hero" about an engineer  "who took one design, cut down the time, saving a dime and inspired a rhyme!"

I'm afraid I don't think it's going to win any poetry awards, here's the first part:

Today he’s gonna make it to the top
And be the Chip Synthesis Hero, silicon in his sight
He took one mega design, placed the gates, cut the time
Chip Synthesis Hero, he got it right.

Oasys is on Twitter 
May 12th, 2010 
Oasys is now on Twitter under the name "OasysDS". If you want to follow us, then go to here and click on "follow" (towards the top left).

If you want to follow some other relevant tweets, you can also search for #eda for a general thread of announcements that are to do with EDA, and at this time of year #47DAC for stuff to do with this year's DAC both before and during the conference.

The Documentation Challenge 
May 4th, 2010 
Bob Widman, who is responsible for the documentation of RealTime Designer, has a piece on EDA DesignLine on the difficulties of his trade. Some of the difficulties come about as a result of having to address a broad spectrum of end users with a single document. Other problems are the result of getting enough bandwidth from engineering (and others) so that the documentation specialist can do his or her job. Beautiful documentation that is factually incorrect is not useful, to say the least. Examples are a particularly tricky area to handle. And all of this has to take place in an environment where every dollar spent is scrutinized very carefully. Some companies (not Oasys!) seem to consider good documentation to be an unaffordable luxury in this economy.

As he concludes:

"Many companies overlook the importance of quality documentation developed by seasoned technical writers. Good documentation should be the cornerstone of product development, helping to create a positive corporate image and setting as a priority customer support and service."
Oasys a "must see" at DAC 
Apr 30th, 2010 
Rather like suddenly finding Christmas merchandise in the stores in September, Bill Murray over at SCDsource has come out with his list of what to see at DAC. Wait, isn't DAC 6 weeks away? Has everything already been announced? And just a top 9 list, isn't 10 the traditional number?

Anyway, happily, Oasys RealTime Designer is on the list, the only synthesis tool to make the cut. Forte and Mentor are there for high-level synthesis but that is a completely different segment, starting from C/SystemC and delivering RTL, just ready to pour straight into RealTime Designer to get an implementation.

Here's Bill's description: Courtesy of Oasys, RealTime Designer is the biggest advance in logic synthesis in more than a decade. According to the company, it has the capacity to handle full-chip designs of up to 100 million gates; it is 20 to 100 times faster than mainstream synthesis tools, with better area and timing QoR. How? It operates and optimizes at the chip/RTL level – not merely the block/gate optimization level. A must see.
Gabe Moretti takes another look 
Apr 15th, 2010 
Synopsys has announced a new release of Design Compiler and Gabe Moretti uses it as a hook to talk about...Oasys. Well, of course, he does talk about Synopsys too but basically argues that Synopsys's latest announcement is a validation of the Oasys approach. It is never possible to deduce too much from simply reading a press release, but Synopsys doesn't seem to be announcing anything nearly as radical as the Oasys approach, they have merged a bit more of their placement into DC. They are certainly not doing anything very different at the RTL front-end where the bulk of Oasys's innovation occurs.

Interestingly, some parts of the article look like something I might have said. Oh wait, there are a couple of paragraphs which are exactly what I said in the white paper!
Sanjiv's opinion piece over at EEtimes 
Apr 9th, 2010 
EDAdesignLine has published Sanjiv's opinion piece on whether EDA is innovative enough. While I agree with much of what he says there, I think that the ecosystem by which EDA products are created is largely broken. Time and time again the big companies have proved incapable of developing and bringing to market genuinely innovative products. Instead small startups have done this, and then become part of the mainstream through acquisition. That is not happening much any more since EDA is not a growing attractive market for investment. Not everyone can afford to do what the founders of Oasys did and fund the company with sweat equity.

And although each process node brings new problems and bigger chips, each node also brings fewer chips. Although EDA is "strategic" to semiconductor companies in some sense, that's not how they seem to regard it. It is a cost to be managed in the same was as IT was until the internet came along and suddenly IT was strategic and every company had a CIO. Which semiconductor company has a C-level design methodology officer?

Mystery fan on ESNUG 
Mar 12th, 2010 
The latest ESNUG newsletter contains an entry by an anonymous user from an anonymous company with high praise for RealTime Designer. They had run out of steam with DC getting big blocks synthesized, got up and running within a couple of hours and compiled their largest 5.8M instance block in 70 minutes in less than 2G of memory. You have to like the closing sentence though:
              "Overall I think Oasys has strong potential to replace Design Compiler."
Innovation of the year: go and vote 
Feb 18th, 2010 
EDN magazine has announced the finalists for its Innovation of the Year awards. Oasys RealTime Designer made the cut in the EDA: Front-End Analysis and Synthesis Tools category. The other four finalists are Jasper's ActiveDesign (formal verification), Synopsys IC Validator (I'm not quite sure even what this does: it is listed as in-design physical verification but that doesn't sound very front-end), Calypto's PowerProMG (power optimization) and OneSpin's RootCause (formal diagnosis). The winner is decided by votes cast (and you can only vote once). So go and vote for RealTimeDesigner.

EDA DesignLine 
Feb 17th, 2010 

There is a new piece up on EDA DesignLine (I think that’s how they write it, with a space after EDA but not after Design; when was it that companies started to write their names like variables in a C program?).

The article is in the usual house style of the websites that grew out of print where you are meant to maintain the fiction that, despite being written by the CEO of Oasys, the piece is just an survey of the industry and doesn’t mention the company by name.

It’s rather off-topic, but there is an interesting article by Michael Kinsely in The Atlantic Monthly about similar obsolete rules in journalism, where the journalist isn’t allowed to critique any statement by someone being interviewed. Instead, to be “objective,” the journalist has to find someone who has that opinion and present them as taking the contrary position, despite the fact that you may well never have heard of the person. Worse, the fact that the journalist works for a brand name newspaper or magazine may be the only reason to take the article more seriously than something by a blogger. But when things get technical, the bloggers tend to know their subjects much better than the supposedly more professional bloggers

Actually I overstated the case about product names. You are allowed one mention so both Oasys and RealTime Designer (I think I got the spaces right again there; when was it that product names...) slip into the final sentence, if you read that far.

And you should. I think that this is the best piece Oasys has written explaining how RealTime Designer works and highlighting just how dramatically different its results are compared with the usual synthesis suspects.

Share it with all your friends. Less fun that skateboarding dogs but more relevant if you are designing large chips and assembling  the hundreds of jigsaw pieces of your chip into something that gets close to the picture on the box that marketing gave you.

Gabe Moretti over at EDAcafe 
Jan 18th, 2010 
Gabe Moretti has a piece in EDAcafe about Oasys. So get an EDAcoffee and go and read it.

It must have been a long time brewing (it's coffee all the way today) since it starts off with encountering Joe Costello and Nanette Collins at DAC (remember that back when San Francisco wasn't cold and wet). But I think his key quote is that he considers that Oasys is "one of the dwindling number of EDA startups that can be successful." Coming from Gabe, who is not noted for being over-optimistic that is high praise indeed.


Gabe also makes the point about how the founders of Oasys had to leave Cadence in order to develop RealTime Designer, rather than being allowed to do it within Cadence. To be fair, Cadence has tried to incubate products internally with more of a startup culture. The Catena router was developed in a skunk works in Los Gatos; the C-to-Silicon was another attempt to get a startup mentality into an internal group. But there is a more fundamental problem: for any given product, one that is not incremental off the existing technology but one that is disruptive, there may be half-a-dozen groups that might be the one to develop breakthrough technology and produce the market leading technology. If one group is internal that is still only a 1 in 6 chance that the internal one will be the winner, and a 5 in 6 chance that an acquisition is a more likely method to get the best technology. Another issue is how to compensate employees in an equivalent manner. If Oasys is wildly successful then the founders will make a lot of money. If they had stayed at Cadence and managed to develop the same successful product then not so much. So why would they stay?

Anyway, they left. Gabe wonders why they did it given that EDA is a market in either secular decline or anemic growth depending on your point of view. But nobody is predicting explosive growth for EDA as a whole. But synthesis is a $350M market and a startup doesn't need to win much of that to be a large startup. In addition, Oasys is biting off a big enough piece of the pie that the interfaces are simple and customers who adopt it will not spend multiples of what they gave Oasys in developing a method to integrate it clumsily into their flows.

Gabe worries about what will happen when Oasys outgrows its market and has built a solid differentiated  business. My answer would be that I can't think of a nicer problem to have but that it is hard to plan for when you don't know how the EDA landscape will look in a few years. My own belief is that if Oasys is successful at building a large fast-growing business and are several years ahead of the traditional EDA company's synthesis products then one of the big guys will acquire them, whether that is what they plan or not. Every company is for sale every day, it's just a matter of price.

Gabe doesn't like the name Chip Synthesis since the chip is the final product, not what comes out of synthesis. He thinks "Design Synthesis" would be better. But I think that sounds rather too like the name of a synthesis product from a well-known EDA company with a purple logo. But then I don't like the RealTime in the product name since it sounds too like something in the RTOS embedded space. Oh well, people are never happy with product names.

So, today's trivia question: what was the name of Berkeley's first logic optimization tool? Espresso. I told you it was coffee all the way.
Welcome 2010 
Dec 26th, 2009 
Oasys had their holiday party last week. The end of the year is a time for both looking back and looking forward. Certainly 2009 has been a wonderful year for Oasys. The capabilities of RealTime Designer have become well-known since DAC. There has been good coverage in what remains of the EDA press and blogs, almost all of it starting off with the attitude that it's too good to be true before coming around to the view that it might, after all, really be a genuine next generation product and not just incrementally better than the traditional synthesis products out there.

But looking forward 2010 is clearly even more significant for Oasys. This is the year in which Oasys will either take off or flame out. Everyone likes the story of RealTime Designer; what's not to like. But in 2010 designers need to be taping out real production chips and the business people need to be making real volume purchases. Startups have a tempo of their own and success cannot be too long coming for all sorts of reasons: money, morale, marketing.

So happy new year to everyone and watch this space in 2010 as the story unfolds.
SCDsource article on Chip Synthesis 
Dec 15th, 2009 
There is a new article on Chip Synthesis up on SCDsource. Due to their editorial policies, which mean you are not allowed to plaster the article with product and company names, you have to read between the lines to deduce that Chip Synthesis really means Oasys RealTime Designer. But, hey, if you are smart enough to design a chip you are smart enough to work out that Paul (vb, not me) is probably not talking about a new release of DC.
Cooley's DAC report is finally out 
Dec 11th, 2009 
John Cooley's DAC report is out (remember DAC, it was that conference back in June) and Oasys gets the first section all to itself. As Cooley says, "Aart de Geus would have a heart attack if he knew the names of his Tier 1 customers anonymously commenting here about Oasys." There are many people listing Oasys RealTime Designer as one of the few (or in some  cases the only) interesting thing that they saw at DAC. So go over there and read the detailed comments.
First
Prev
38 Entries, Page of 2, Page Size Next Last

This page has been visited 47,864 times since June 12th, 2009

This is an ApogeeInvent Dynamic Website